Showing posts with label Surnames. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Surnames. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 July 2015

Reading Irish parish registers

Have you got Irish people in your family tree?

If you have, and they were Catholics, you may have been spending the last few days the same way as I have, scrolling through the newly-released images of parish registers from the National Library of Ireland.

And going cross-eyed deciphering the handwriting, the abbreviated first names and the just plain odd-looking ones.

National Library of Ireland, CC by YvonneM
These records are pure gold dust for those of us with Irish ancestors. And they’re free to view, print and download. I’m very grateful to the NLI for putting them online for those of us who can’t visit their (wonderful) building in Dublin to look through the microfiches there. It would be petty to grumble about the fact that they’re not indexed. But just to make the job of scrolling through all those pages easier, I thought I’d pass on some tips I’ve found useful during my search for my ancestors, the Delanys or Delaneys in the parish of Tomacork (also called Carnew), on the border of counties Wicklow and Wexford.

I’m going to use these Tomacork documents to illustrate my points, because I’ve become familiar with many of their quirks. I hope this will be a helpful starting point for your reading of similar resources.

The first tip is – keep going. I found that, as my eyes got used to the handwriting of the various priests and the names which came up again and again, reading the records grew easier. So don’t give up. Like so many worthwhile things, reading these records can get easier when you practise.

Patt (Patrick) Rossiter, with a long s
If you’re new to reading old documents, you might be confused by the unusual shapes of many letters. The records I’ve been looking at date from 1785 onwards, so they’re not from too long ago, but they’re still old enough to take some deciphering if you don’t know how to mentally transcribe them. Long or ‘leading’ s, for example – the one that looks like an f without a cross-bar.


Or the very curly capital letters that don’t look at all like print ones. Here are a few:
Two examples of Anne (top L, bottom R)
A curly H in Hugh
Two examples of capital K in Kelly
A capital B that looks like an M in Brislawn
The capital A in Anne, with no cross-bar, takes a bit of getting used to, and capital H and K look similar. In fact the second Kelly takes some deciphering.

There are a few websites with old handwriting alphabets which can help with reading records. This one is a good place to start, and I've listed more at the end of this post.

Luckily, when we read old records we’re not just reading a sequence of letters. Though that is often the best way of deciphering words. It takes me back to school... C, A, T, cat...

You may need to just write down the letters you’re sure of and go back later once you’re more used to the writer’s hand or have identified the letter somewhere else in the document. That's how I was sure of the examples above.

Repeated words or phrases can be helpful here, because we know what the letters are and can work out quirky variations from them. And you can often work out what a letter is by its context.

What's Judy's surname here? Byron? I happen to know, and reading these parish registers confirms, that Byrne was a very widespread name in Tomacork. In fact it's in the old clan territory of the O'Byrnes. So I can work out that she's most likely a Byrne by comparing this word with many others on the same pages, written by the same person.


But beware of doing what we all do – reading what we think, or hope,
we see, and not what’s actually there. It’s important to check against other examples of the (supposed) letter written by the same person.
Is this crossed out sponsor a new relative, James Delany? I'd love to think so. But there's a Darcy on the same page.
And the descender from Lucy on the line above in the first image may or may not have merged with the l of Delany. In addition, the registers are full of people called Demsey (a variation on Dempsey), another local name. Though this priest usually writes it Dempsey.

 I can't just assume the name here is what I'd like it to be.

What do you think? Delany, Darcy, Demsey or... impossible to decide?


And then there’s image quality.The NLI registers are images from microfiche, so some pen strokes are hard to read or invisible. These entries look like a bad photocopy.

You can find some good tips on reading photocopied records here.

Sometimes you’ll have all the letters worked out, but they don’t look like any name you’ve heard of. There are two possible solutions: the name could be an abbreviation, or it could be written as it sounded to the scribe.

Abbreviations first. In these Catholic parish registers they’re only used for first names and a few stock phrases. There are lists of name abbreviations on the web and I’ve put links at the bottom, but here are a few of the most common found in genealogy records. A good rule of thumb is that the last letter of the abbreviation is the last letter of the name. Except for Jno.

Edwd = Edward
Elizth = Elizabeth
Jno = John (not Jonathan)
Margt = Margaret 
Thos - Thomas
Wm = William

And some from the Tomacork records which may be helpful to Irish research:

Anty = Anthony
Batt = Bartholomew
Catt = Catherine
Lau - Laurence
Mattw = Matthew
Michl = Michael
Patt - Patrick

I've used a smaller font to show letters which are usually written superscript (above the base line).

There are some other abbreviations in these registers, like SS for Sponsors (godparents), and Latin ones like Ills or Illa for Illegitimus/a (illegitimate), usually followed by (ut dixit), or 'it is said', referring to the father.


Plenty of names in these registers are written as they sounded to the priest. That can be confusing. Some are easier to read, like Onor for Hono[u]r, Annistice for Anastasia, Kavinaugh for Kavanagh.

Then there are ones which ask more from us. One of my Delanys, Daniel, was married to Mary Costolough.
That’s a fun one, with a long s and no cross to the t. I only found two other Costoloughs after a lot of genea-searching, and it seemed to be a variant of Costello. Then the light bulb came on. Reading it out loud, remembering that Irish names tend to be stressed on the first syllable, and knowing that the priest used a silent gh in several names, it became clear that, yes, /’kɒstələʊ/ (using the IPA transcription) worked for Costolough and Costello.

I'll be posting about my Delaney/Delany finds over on A Rebel Hand soon. In the meantime, good luck with your old records! And finally – the genealogist’s mantra – don’t assume. But you know that already...

Further online resources

Useful sites for reading old handwriting:


Alphabets:


Reading bad scans/photocopies:


Name abbreviations:


Irish surnames:

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

What Napoleon did for us

I loved reading Sue Adam's post about Going Dutch, starting with Civil Registration. Thank you for taking me up on my challenge! One of the commenters, ScotSue, remarked how she "was struck by how early civil registration was introduced compared with countries in the UK."

We have Napoleon to thank for that. The French invaded the Netherlands in 1794/95. In some southern parts of the Netherlands, the civil registration of births, marriages and deaths was introduced at that time, but in most of the country it was introduced in 1811.

At that time, everyone who did not have a surname was required to take one. This includes people in the north who still went by their patronymics, people in the east who called themselves after the farm they lived on and most Jews. This forced taking of names gave rise to the myth that people in the Netherlands did not have surnames before Napoleon, which is untrue for most of the country. A casual comment to dis-spell that myth on a blog article introduced me to a wonderful client.

Name taking record of Jelmer Sipkes Sipma.1 Image credit: Tresoar
When the civil registration started, the French confiscated all the church records of baptisms, marriages and deaths so that they would have a solid starting point and could verify the identity and ages of prospective brides and grooms. To this day, church records from before 1811 can be found in government-run archives.

Napoleon also made a start with the introduction of a nation-wide property registration system, the Kadaster. It wasn't fully implemented until 1828, well after the French occupation, when the Dutch government realized the merits of knowing all (taxable!) lands. The first maps and ledgers are available online at the WatWasWaar website.

The great thing about understanding these registrations is that it's easy to do research in France, because the system is very similar. That is how I was able to help several visitors to Who Do You Think You Are? Live! find their French ancestors, despite not having much experience with French research myself.

Because the Dutch were used to good record-keeping since 1811, Dutch emigrants also had their vital events recorded much earlier than most of their new neighbors. In many states in the US, vital records were not mandatory until the early 1900s but you can often find records for Dutch people as early as the 1840s. Don't you wish for some Dutch ancestors yourself?

Friday, 19 September 2014

Have you thought about joining a Family Society, Association, or Organization?

When I first started to explore my family history, I discovered periodicals that were produced by Family Organizations.  These presented wonderful clues for me.  I was able to follow their research to know how and where to explore to prove my ancestors.  Sometimes the thesis that a researcher on the family presented proved wrong, but isn't that the purpose?  You present and idea and then prove or disprove it?  They collaborate with information and delight in sharing pictures or "finds" they have made.  It is a place you can bounce ideas off of.  Researchers are the beneficiaries of the newsletters or publications which the member's donations fund the subscriptions to various libraries. (I funded the Vance Newsletter for Clayton Genealogical Library in Houston.)  Many now have a DNA project they manage for their surname.  Don't be discouraged if you aren't a male descendant. Many are beginning to recognize the value of atDNA tests (autosomal) and are adding them.
My example of a newsletter front.

How do you find your "Family Organization?"  Some Organizations are a Surname that pulls in people that had the same surname.  I found in the United States, it often follows the theme of a myth, for example:"three brothers came to the United States..." For my Mayflower ancestors, there were is the lineage society of the Mayflower and individuals, such as The Pilgrim John Howland Society.  I am being simplistic here; there are many family societies of all shapes and sizes. Some require a membership fee, usually because they have a project which fees provides funds to support.  Some don't have membership fees, but do require a pedigree to prove relationship.  Again, I am just giving examples.  
Finding your Family Organization or Association may prove problematic.  You can find some that are listed in books written by people who have researched names, periodicals in the genealogy department, and organizations like the Federation of Genealogy Societies membership.  Directory of Family Associations Paperback –1996 by Elizabeth Petty Bentley (check your local library, or it is available in paperback online) is one book available.  
On the internet, searching for a surname organization is not always intuitive.  The title could be an acronym instead of the name. Some of the organizations are not on the internet or have moved to social media sites like Facebook.  That is when organizations like the United Kingdom FFHS and Cindi’s List come in handy.
I have the privilege of helping compile and add Family Organizations to a FamilySearch Wiki page.   It has been sad to see many old organizations have disbanded because of age related problems, since no new younger people showed and interest.  There are many unanswered or unproven mysteries in family files.  Those who have proven their ancestors can help the new or continuing researcher to sort out the records best for the researcher's use. There is good to be done by participating in a Family Society.  I digress.
Going back to my "job", for those of you that know of a Family Society, Organization, or Association, come to the Wiki, see if it is there, if it is not add it.  The word is Wiki. It is for anyone to edit, correct or add information to. It is good advertising to seek out members.
These are some resources for seeing if your Family Society is still active and you can join. 
Some family societies join State and Nation Societies where you can find a list.
Federation of Genealogical Societies
Directory of Family Associations Paperback –1996 by Elizabeth Petty Bentley (check your local library, or it is available in paperback online. 
Cyndi's List has Surname, Family Associations and Family Newletters.  unfortunately through no fault of her own, many links are broken.   
Sometimes when associated with a specific organiztion you can find them on the Wikipedia such as the List of Mormon Family Organizations.  It says Mormon but many are New England ancestors common to member and nonmember alike.
Another resource is GenWeb Counties like Washington, Tennessee, they list Associations related to their county. 
Some Blogger's have lists on their blogs too. 
This is the FamilySearch Wiki pages. It is a work in progress; names have been searched and discovered through the internet. 

Thursday, 31 July 2014

CuriousFox: a gazetteer and message system

Logo on www.curiousfox.com
CuriousFox is a gazetteer and message system that connects genealogists and local historians. Collaboration between these two groups is immensely beneficial.

In CuriousFox, every town and village in the United Kingdom and Ireland has its own page. There is also a USA version, which I have not personally used.

Things I like about CuriousFox include:
  • Exact map locations and historic maps.
  • Free to join, add entries, and search by village or surname.
  • With surname searches, finding relevant entries is easier because you can work at town / village level.
  • You can search for 'nearby' entries.
  • It is easy to edit or delete your entries.
  • Google searches will find your entries (so 'new relatives' can contact you).
  • No spam (your email address is not visible).
  • Privacy (the system sends messages between members, and you decide whether to give a particular member your address).
  • Advantages of being a paying member (about five pounds per year) include:
    • Contact and be contacted by all other members (free or paying).
    • Receive email alerts when people add entries for towns of interest to you.
    • Publicise your Web page or blog.

Entry screen for my ASHTON message
HINTS:
  • Give some thought to the wording of your entries. They should be concise, with surnames (and only surnames) in capital letters. Specify dates, and use appropriate punctuation.

  • For large towns with many entries and multiple pages, delete your entry every year and immediately resubmit it (updated if necessary) so that it reappears near the top of the list for that town. I did this recently, and within 24 hours a local historian contacted me and offered to send transcriptions of land records for that surname/town!

I hope you will try Curious Fox and share your success stories in a comment here. You might also like:

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

The 5Ws - Who or Whom?


For my initial contributions to this blog I decided that Who, What, When, Where and Why would guide me in my posts. Last month I couldn't work out how to attack Why so I moved on the Where and detailed the hometowns and countries of my earliest ancestors.

I am leaving What in the parking lot for the moment because I want to talk more about Who or should that be Whom? In my first Who post I spoke about myself and in my second Who post I spoke about my grandparents and shared some basic info on my direct lines.

As we are individuals we all approach our research in different ways and with different motives. So Who or Whom am I researching may differ from whom you research.

Richard Aspinall and family - direct ancestors
I am mainly interested in my direct ancestors and I want to find out as much as I can about these people, the places they lived and their stories. As I like to put them in context within their families I gather information on their siblings. I love finding cousin connections so I want to identify  people who share my ancestors  and discover where life has taken them.  I will add basic details of  the spouses of blood relations but I don't take this research much further unless I find someone interesting and out of the ordinary like Helen Bartholomew.

I am keen to discover and document the stories of those great aunts and uncles and closer cousins who had no offspring of their own and hope to write up some profiles in my Geniaus blog. People like my 2x Great Uncle, Michael Harrington Ryan, an Australian pioneer priest deserve to have their stories told.

I want to leave a legacy of a family history for my children so I put the same effort into researching Mr GeniAus' side of the family as I do into my own. Researching my children's ancestry has not taken me beyond Australia, The United Kingdom and Ireland.

Now that I have married off the children and they have produced another generation I feel the need to research all of their lines for the grandchildren. I have not put as much effort into this research as into my own but I have tried to put together some sort of pedigree for the youngest generation.  This has been a great challenge for me as Greece, Malta and The Netherlands have been added to my places to research. If I live to be 90 I might get around to writing about these people, their places and stories.

To date I have 8983 Individual Records and 2918 Family Records in my database. 4,678 (52.08%) are male, 4,257 (47.39%0 are female and I'm not sure about the rest.

There is a long list of surnames from Abbott to Zsmidzsar in my database with many names in between.

Top 30 surnames (total individuals):
Curry (236)
Sly (159)
Magick (155)
Pusell (127)
Sibbald (118)
Elms (102)
Hogden (91)
Gowans (89)
Kealy (89)
Madgwick (84)
 
Smith (79)
Beetson (77)
Nelson (77)
Brydon (71)
Price (61)
Reakes (54)
Woodhead (49)
Clarke (48)
Tooze (48)
Cameron (47)
 
Spruce (47)
Cavanagh (45)
Ball (42)
Gardiner (42)
Molloy (39)
Johnson (38)
Stuart (38)
Ryan (37)
Gillespie (36)
Lockett (36)

Who or Whom are you researching?